lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.15-rt16
From
Date
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:39 -0600, Clark Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 13:32 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm still curious to what's happening with your kernel. I'm currently
> > > running my x86_64 (typing right now on it) with CONFIG_SMP=n and
> > > CONFIG_LATENCY=y. I know you probably sent a config before, but could
> > > you send it to me again. (probably best to send it to me off list)
> >
> > yeah, it's been gnawing at me too. Not really stopping me, but I've seen
> > it happen on two Athlon64's (3000+ and 3400+).
> >
> > I'll send the .config offlist.
>
> Clark,
>
> Could you make sure that your modules in the initrd that you use are the
> ones created with the LATENCY_TRACE option. After converting all the
> modules into compiled in options, I successfully booted the kernel. So
> you might have an incompatibility with the modules in initrd, when you
> turn on LATENCY_TRACE.

Did you ever duplicated the failure?

I'm fairly certain that the initrd contains the appropriate modules,
since I regenerate the initrd each time I generate a new kernel, but
I'll go back and verify.

I'll also convert modules to compiled in and see if that makes a
difference.

Clark

--
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-01 22:54    [W:0.053 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site