lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.16.32 stuck in generic_file_aio_write()

> I thought it was, but from my look through yout 8-billion-task backtrace,
> no task was stuck in D-state with the appropriate call trace.

I was afraid of that... Where is the lock on the i_mutex suppose
to be released ? I can't grasp the codepath from within an interrupt back
to the fs layer.

> So I don't know what's causing this. In the first trace you have at least
> four D-state kjournalds and a lot of processes stuck on an i_mutex. I
> guess it's consistent with an IO system which is losing completion
> interrupts. AFAICT in the second trace all you have is a lot of processes
> stuck on i_mutex for no obvious reason - I don't know why that would
> happen.

Is there any way to see if it is missing interrupts ? Enabling the
debugging in the areca driver isn't a good idea on this machine, it's a
heavely IO loaded machine, and the problem seems to take some time to occur.

I *does* happen less often with a 2.6.19 kernel however.

The task dump takes > 10 seconds, which causes the softlock detector to
trigger. Is there any objection to a patch which disables the lockup
detector during the dump ? It isn't a big issue, since al it does is dump
a stacktrace.

I've enabled most debugging now, I'll see of i can run both a disk and VM
stresstest.

I'll put a .config and a dmesg of the machine booting at
http://www.jdi-ict.nl/plain/ for those who want to look at it.


Regards,


Igmar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-07 11:01    [W:0.059 / U:1.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site