lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
    On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Ok. For SMP-safety, it's important that any architecture that can't do
    > this needs to _share_ the same spinlock (on SMP only, of course) that it
    > uses for the bitops.

    That doesn't help, since assignment can't be guarded by any lock.

    > It would be good (but perhaps not as strict a requirement) if the atomic
    > counters also use the same lock. But that is probably impossible on
    > sparc32 (since it has a per-counter "lock"-like thing, iirc). So doing a
    > cmpxchg() on an atomic_t would be a bug.

    sparc32 switched over to the parisc way of doing things, so they could
    expand their atomic_t to a full 32 bits. They still have the old
    atomic_24_t lying around for their arch-private use, but atomic_t uses a
    hashed spinlock.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-06 20:33    [W:4.182 / U:0.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site