[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it

    On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote:
    > No. sparc32 doesn't have one, for instance.

    Ok. For SMP-safety, it's important that any architecture that can't do
    this needs to _share_ the same spinlock (on SMP only, of course) that it
    uses for the bitops.

    It would be good (but perhaps not as strict a requirement) if the atomic
    counters also use the same lock. But that is probably impossible on
    sparc32 (since it has a per-counter "lock"-like thing, iirc). So doing a
    cmpxchg() on an atomic_t would be a bug.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.018 / U:248.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site