[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> No. sparc32 doesn't have one, for instance.

Ok. For SMP-safety, it's important that any architecture that can't do
this needs to _share_ the same spinlock (on SMP only, of course) that it
uses for the bitops.

It would be good (but perhaps not as strict a requirement) if the atomic
counters also use the same lock. But that is probably impossible on
sparc32 (since it has a per-counter "lock"-like thing, iirc). So doing a
cmpxchg() on an atomic_t would be a bug.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.088 / U:8.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site