[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[PATCH 0/4] Lumpy Reclaim V3
This is a repost of the lumpy reclaim patch set.  This is
basically unchanged from the last post, other than being rebased
to 2.6.19-rc2-mm2. This has passed basic stress testing on a range
of machines here.

[Sorry for the delay reposting, I had a test failure and needed
to confirm it was not due to lumpy before posting.]

As before, I have left the changes broken out for the time being
so as to make it clear what is the original and what is my fault.
I would expect to roll this up before acceptance.


=== 8< ===
Lumpy Reclaim (V3)

When we are out of memory of a suitable size we enter reclaim.
The current reclaim algorithm targets pages in LRU order, which
is great for fairness but highly unsuitable if you desire pages at
higher orders. To get pages of higher order we must shoot down a
very high proportion of memory; >95% in a lot of cases.

This patch set adds a lumpy reclaim algorithm to the allocator.
It targets groups of pages at the specified order anchored at the
end of the active and inactive lists. This encourages groups of
pages at the requested orders to move from active to inactive,
and active to free lists. This behaviour is only triggered out of
direct reclaim when higher order pages have been requested.

This patch set is particularly effective when utilised with
an anti-fragmentation scheme which groups pages of similar
reclaimability together.

This patch set (against 2.6.19-rc6-mm2) is based on Peter Zijlstra's
lumpy reclaim V2 patch which forms the foundation. It comprises
the following patches:

lumpy-reclaim-v2 -- Peter Zijlstra's lumpy reclaim prototype,

lumpy-cleanup-a-missplaced-comment-and-simplify-some-code --
cleanups to move a comment back to where it came from, to make
the area edge selection more comprehensible and also cleans up
the switch coding style to match the concensus in mm/*.c,

lumpy-ensure-we-respect-zone-boundaries -- bug fix to ensure we do
not attempt to take pages from adjacent zones, and

lumpy-take-the-other-active-inactive-pages-in-the-area -- patch to
increase aggression over the targetted order.

Testing of this patch set under high fragmentation high allocation
load conditions shows significantly improved high order reclaim
rates than a standard kernel. The stack here it is now within 5%
of the best case linear-reclaim figures.

It would be interesting to see if this setup is also successful in
reducing order-2 allocation failures that you have been seeing with
jumbo frames.

Please consider for -mm.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-06 18:03    [W:0.081 / U:2.908 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site