Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:25:42 +0100 | From | Samuel Thibault <> | Subject | Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP |
| |
H. Peter Anvin, le Wed 06 Dec 2006 07:16:39 -0800, a écrit : > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >>Is there any way to fix this? Glibc people don't seem to want to fix it > >>on their part, see > >>http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 > > > >Hi, > > > >Ulrich asked you to go to us once your time travel machine was > >finished.. is it finished yet ? ;=) > > > >this is part of the ABI, so we can't change this in 2006... > > > > If ENOTSUP is currently unused and is only there for completeness, then > it should be fine to add it.
The functions that should be returning it instead of EOPNOTSUP should be fixed too.
Samuel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |