[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: D-cache aliasing issue in cow_user_page
On 12/5/06, David Miller <> wrote:
> From: "Matt Reimer" <>
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:38:13 -0800
> > In light of James Bottomsley's commit[1] declaring that kmap() and
> > friends now have to take care of coherency issues, is the patch "mm:
> > D-cache aliasing issue in cow_user_page"[2] correct, or could it
> > potentially cause a slowdown by calling flush_dcache_page() a second
> > time (i.e. once in an architecture-specific kmap() implementation, and
> > once in cow_user_page())?
> kmap() is a NOP unless HIGHMEM is configured.
> Therefore, it cannot possibly take care of D-cache aliasing issues
> across the board.

Right, but isn't he declaring that each architecture needs to take
care of this? So, say, on ARM we'd need to make kunmap() not a NOP and
call flush_dcache_page() ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-06 01:59    [W:0.046 / U:5.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site