lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] fsstack: Fix up ecryptfs's fsstack usage
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:38:07 -0500
> Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:
>
> > > When your patches are queued in -mm please do test them there, and review
> > > others' changes to them, and raise patches against them. Raising patches
> > > against one's private tree and not testing the code which is planned to be
> > > merged can introduce errors.
> >
> > Sorry about that. I noticed your fix, and the one by Adrian. And I did add
> > them to my fsstack queue.
>
> you don't have an fsstack queue any more ;)

Good point :)

> Please, I really do want developers to test their code in -mm once I've
> merged it. What happens if there's some nasty interaction between your
> patch and someone else's? We'll not find out about it and it'll get
> merged.

Point taken.

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

--
I already backed up the box once, I can do it again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-06 00:19    [W:0.109 / U:7.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site