lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] fsstack: Fix up ecryptfs's fsstack usage
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:38:07 -0500
Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:

> > When your patches are queued in -mm please do test them there, and review
> > others' changes to them, and raise patches against them. Raising patches
> > against one's private tree and not testing the code which is planned to be
> > merged can introduce errors.
>
> Sorry about that. I noticed your fix, and the one by Adrian. And I did add
> them to my fsstack queue.

you don't have an fsstack queue any more ;)

Please, I really do want developers to test their code in -mm once I've
merged it. What happens if there's some nasty interaction between your
patch and someone else's? We'll not find out about it and it'll get
merged.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-05 23:51    [W:0.063 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site