lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Mounting NFS root FS
From
Date
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 19:12 +0200, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> > 2) NFS provides persistent storage.
>
> To me this sounds like a chicken and an egg problem. It
> both depends and provides this at the same time :/. But
> hey, if it's supposed to work then OK.

??? Locking depends on persistent storage, but persistent storage never
depended on locking. Neither rpc.statd nor lockd, nor the nfs client
depend on locking working a priori.

> Anyhoo, I tried this at some stage and failed as random
> clients seemed to occasionally get stuck in insmod¹ at
> boot (infinite wait on lock that never gets released).
> At that stage guess was that server could not properly
> recognize client reboot given stale client lock data.
> But if it's supposed to work I guess I have to give it
> another shot and do better analysis on it.
>
> What about NLM/NSM protocol issues - do they properly
> deal with packet loss and clients that stay down (client
> holding a lock crashing and staying down; will the lock
> ever be released)?

1) Packet loss is dealt with by retrying ad-infinitum.

2) No. The problem of client crashes was fixed in NFSv4 with the
addition of lease-based locks.

> ¹ And why does insmod require a lock on module at load??

Does it? I've no idea why it should need that.

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-04 19:25    [W:0.068 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site