lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: la la la la ... swappiness
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> but that's rather dumb. Better would be to remove mlocked pages from the
> LRU.

Could we generalize the removal of sections of a zone from the LRU? I
believe this would help various buffer allocation schemes. We have some
issues with heavy LRU scans if large buffers are allocated on some
nodes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-04 19:19    [W:0.057 / U:2.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site