Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:43:48 -0500 | From | "Jon Smirl" <> | Subject | Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic, new libata code |
| |
On 12/28/06, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Thursday 28 December 2006 03:16, Jon Smirl wrote: > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/0x20000000/5078 > > [<c02b0289>] __sched_text_start+0x5f9/0xb00 > > [<c024a623>] net_rx_action+0xb3/0x180 > > [<c01210f2>] __do_softirq+0x72/0xe0 > > [<c0105205>] do_IRQ+0x45/0x80 > > This doesn't seem to be related to libata at all. Like your > first trace, you call schedule from a softirq context, which > is always atomic. > The only place where I can imagine this happening is the > local_irq_enable() in there, which can be defined in different > ways. > Are you running with paravirt_ops, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT > and/or kernel preemption enabled?
This is set, although I don't recall setting it. CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y
Another odd thing I'm doing is simultaneously using a wired and wireless net at the same time.
> > Arnd <>< >
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |