Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:32:46 -0800 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h |
| |
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:34:38 +0000 Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 10:18:12PM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote: > > > > > Uh-huh. How much of build coverage have you got with it? > > > > Well, as said in the patch description, I compiled alpha, arm, i386, ia64, > > mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and > > allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64. I also checked that > > no new warnings were introduced by the patch. > > That would not have covered the following drivers in this patch on ARM > then: > > acorn/* > nwflash > i2c-iop3xx > i2c-s3c2410 > ether1 > ether3 > etherh > omap_cf > pxa2xx_lubbock > sa1100_badge4 > sa1100_cerf > sa1100_h3600 > sa1100_jornada720 > sa1100_neponset > sa1100_shannon > sa1100_simpad > acornscsi > arxescsi > cumana_1 > cumana_2 > ecoscsi > eesox > fas216 > oak > powertec > at91_udc > omap_udc > pxa2xx_udc > zaurus > > To cover these, you need to build at least rpc_defconfig, lubbock_defconfig, > netwinder_defconfig, badge4_defconfig, cerf_defconfig, ...etc... > > The whole "all*config" idea on ARM is utterly useless - you can _not_ > get build coverage that way.
Uh, can J. Random Developer submit patches to the ARM build system for testing?
--- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |