[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.4 PATCH] missing parenthesis
Hi Willy, 

> Thanks for your work at fixing all this code. I'm wondering though,
> given the type of errors, this code should never have been able to
> build at all, so that means that it might not be used at all.

Either not used or #ifdef'ed so much that it is rarely build.

> As a general rule of thumb, keep in mind that we're not much tempted
> to fix known unused code, especially if it's unmaintained. The reason

Maybe dumb question but ... how do I know which parts of code are unused
and/or unmaintained?

> is simple : when some code does not work, people who need it often
> maintain patches in their tree to make it work. When we start changing
> things there, their patches often apply with rejects. Anyway, *I* am
> still for a clean kernel because I know that there's nothing more
> annoying than spending days chasing a bug which we discover was known
> for years.
> So what I can propose you is that we :
> - postpone those patches for 2.4.35-pre


> - ask maintainers of each of these files if he accepts to fix the
> file, because some of them are totally against any such change.

Ok. Couple of questions:

- how do we do that?
- do I resend each patch to proper maintainer?
- if there is no maintainer then what? (btw. is there any other
more accurate source of MAINTAINERS for each file in the kernel tree?)
- do I have to resend them once more to LKML?

> - we would merge the accepted patches and those without any reply
> which we consider relevant early in the 35-pre cycle so that
> people have some time to inform us about the potential conflicts
> they encounter.
> Quite frankly, there should be very few problems, considering that we
> have affected more files with the gcc4 patches and that nobody
> complained.
> As an exception, if you get some maintainer's approval for some of
> the patches during 2.4.34 cycle, of course I will merge them first
> because as I said, it's important to maintain supported code in good
> shape.
> Is it OK for you ?



Mariusz Kozlowski
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-02 12:05    [W:0.049 / U:1.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site