Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:54:39 +0100 | From | Francois Romieu <> | Subject | Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)) |
| |
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org> : [...] > No, that wouldn't make sense, that's like making a workaround depend on > arch == i386. > > I'm thinking that we should somehow enable this option on the n2100 > built-in r8169 ports by default only. Since the n2100 also has a mini-PCI > slot, and it is in theory possible to put an r8169 on a mini-PCI card, > the workaround probably shouldn't apply to those, so testing for > CONFIG_MACH_N2100 also isn't the right thing to do.
Ok, I thought it was a useability thing.
Let aside a few configurations, the sensible default value for this option is not clear. I have no objection against a patch but it seems a bit academic as long as nobody complains (you can call me lazy too).
-- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |