[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
On 12/13/06, Eric W. Biederman <> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <> writes:
> > the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already
> > enough... at least for irqbalance
> What is the problem you are trying to solve?
> If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that
> with a single bit.
> My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to
> solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see
> the real world problem.

Good question.

irqbalance could use set_affinity from boot cpu to final cpu.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-14 07:27    [W:0.047 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site