[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Clarify i386/Kconfig explanation of the HIGHMEM config options
Theodore Tso wrote:
>> + 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer "off" here.
> I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
> than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
> If we want to be even more explicit about this, then if the CPU level
> selected by the user is greater than Pentium-M (or whatever is was the
> oldest CPU that didn't have NX support --- Arjan?) we shouldn't offer
> this choice at all, and force CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G. We can give the user
> a choice if CONFIG_EMBEDDED is enabled, but otherwise, if the CPU
> level is new enough, I think we can safely make the argument that for
> nearly all systems, they have enough memory and speed that perhaps we
> should just simply always use HIGHMEM64G.

CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not a good name for PAE, which is a feature that
enables both large physical memory and nx.

IMO we should have CONFIG_PAE, selected by either CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G or a

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-14 17:19    [W:0.042 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site