Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:20:14 +0100 | From | Jarek Poplawski <> | Subject | Re: Recursive spinlocks for Network Recursion Bugs in 2.6.18 |
| |
On 09-12-2006 08:31, Jeffrey V. Merkey wrote: > > > This code segment in /net/core/dev.c is a prime example of the need for > recursive spin locks. ... > Recursive spinlocks perform the logic ... > LONG rspin_lock(rlock_t *rlock) ... > LONG rspin_unlock(rlock_t *rlock) ...
Could you give some hint how this code from dev.c should be changed to gain by this?
Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |