lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: workqueue deadlock
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:16:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> One quite different way of addressing all of this is to stop using
> stop_machine_run() for hotplug synchronisation and switch to the swsusp
> freezer infrastructure: all kernel threads and user processes need to stop
> and park themselves in a known state before we allow the CPU to be removed.
> lock_cpu_hotplug() becomes a no-op.

Well ...you still need to provide some mechanism for stable access to
cpu_online_map in blocking functions (ex: do_event_scan_all_cpus).
Freezing-tasks/Resuming-them-after-hotp-unplug is definitely not one of them
(when they resume, online_map would have changed under their feet).

> Dunno if it'll work - I only just thought of it. It sure would simplify
> things.

--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-11 06:49    [W:0.064 / U:3.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site