lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -rt][RESEND] spin lock imbalance in ibm emac

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 10:27 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sent this a long time ago, still exists.
> > >
> > > Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
> >
> > hm, what does this do, and why isnt it upstream?
>
> AFAIK, those locks are added in -rt . I'm not sure how they got in
> there, but they fix that driver when running in a thread. The driver
> has unsafe SMP locking, but the only system it runs on (PPC4xx) is
> uniprocessor. So it's not broken upstream per se.

ok, i've applied your patch.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-11 17:03    [W:0.052 / U:1.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site