[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch][rfc] rwsem: generic rwsem
    On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:58:42PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
    > Nick Piggin <> wrote:
    > > > Look at how the counter works in the XADD-based version. That's the way
    > > > it is *because* I'm using XADD. That's quite limiting.
    > >
    > > Not really. ll/sc architectures "emulate" xadd the same as they would
    > > emulate a spinlock. There is nothing suboptimal about it.
    > Yes, really. You've missed the point entirely. Look at *how* the counter
    > *works*.

    OK, I've looked but I can't see how you would make it more optimal on
    an ll/sc architecture. The atomic_add_return variant has no more atomic
    or barrier operations than the spinlock one, and it has less loads and
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-11 05:07    [W:0.018 / U:49.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site