[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16

On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > If I remember right, it breaks Chris Wedgwood's box
> I'm not bothered about 2.6.16.x anymore, feel free to do whatever is
> needed there.

That's really not the point.

What's the whole _reason_ for 2.6.x.y releases?

They should be safe, and OBVIOUS.

If there is a box that breaks with a 2.6.x.y release, then that .y release
was clearly a mistake, and fundamentally broke the whole point of the
stable tree. If you can't depend on the stable tree being a real
improvement - regardless of what hw you are on - then the stable tree has
lost all meaning, and you'd be better off just getting 2.6.x+1 instead.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.081 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site