[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:15:46 CST, Corey Minyard said:
>> Ouch, I guess we've never had a system with these address types. Thanks.
> If we never had a system with these address types..
>>> static unsigned char intf_mem_inw(struct si_sm_io *io, unsigned int offset)
>>> {
>>> return (readw((io->addr)+(offset * io->regspacing)) >> io->regshift)
>>> - && 0xff;
>>> + & 0xff;
>>> }
> Is this dead code that isn't called by anybody?
Well, not exactly. The SMBIOS or ACPI tables that report these interfaces
have various options for the size of the device registers. The driver
implements all the options, but there may or may not be systems with
every option available. But I can't exactly guess what is available in the


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-09 15:47    [W:0.040 / U:5.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site