lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
    On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 11:21:46PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > I think we can add a flag to __create_workqueue() that will indicate if
    > this one is to be running with PF_NOFREEZE and a corresponding macro like
    > create_freezable_workqueue() to be used wherever we want the worker thread
    > to freeze (in which case it should be calling try_to_freeze() somewhere).
    > Then, we can teach filesystems to use this macro instead of
    > create_workqueue().

    At what point does the workqueue get frozen? i.e. how does this
    guarantee an unfrozen filesystem will end up in a consistent
    state?

    Cheers,

    Dave.
    --
    Dave Chinner
    Principal Engineer
    SGI Australian Software Group
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-10 02:01    [W:0.026 / U:1.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site