Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices | From | Matt Helsley <> | Date | Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:47:54 -0800 |
| |
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 12:02 -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > Paul M wrote: > > I think it's better to treat resource groups as a common framework for > > resource controllers, rather than a resource controller itself. > > You could well be right here - I was just using resource groups > as another good example of a controller. I'll let others decide > if that's one or several controllers.
At various stages different controllers were available with the core patches or separately. The numtasks, cpu, io, socket accept queue, and memory controllers were available for early CKRM patches. More recently (April 2006) numtasks, cpu, and memory controllers were available for Resource Groups.
So I'd say "several".
Cheers, -Matt Helsley
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |