[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
    On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > Per-CPU tasklets are equivalent to softirqs, with extra complexity and
    > overhead ontop of it :-)
    > so please just introduce a rebalance softirq and attach the scheduling
    > rebalance tick to it. But i'd suggest to re-test on the 4096-CPU box,
    > maybe what 'fixed' your workload was the global serialization of the
    > tasklet. With a per-CPU softirq approach we are i think back to the same
    > situation that broke your system before.

    What broke the system was the disabling of interrupts over long time
    periods during load balancing.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-07 22:01    [W:0.029 / U:15.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site