Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:40:59 -0500 (EST) | From | Jason Baron <> | Subject | Re: locking hierarchy based on lockdep |
| |
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > interesting...perhaps if we layered say the directory structure on the > > list too like by the top level kernel directories drivers, kernel, mm, > > net, etc. it might be more readable. > > I'm not sure that you need to do something manual or ad hoc like that, > although it might be necessary in the end. I'd be curious to see how > the list of locks partitions up if you just divide it up into groups > of locks that have some relationship. I guess the question is, if you > draw the graph whose nodes are locks and whose edges connect locks > that are held together, how many connected pieces does that graph have? > > - R. >
ok, so grouping the list by sections of connected components-that's a nice idea, and would probably make for an interesting list.
-jason - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |