[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:09:42AM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Every processor I've ever measured it on, popf is slower. On P4, for
> example, pushf is 6 cycles, and popf is 54. On Opteron, it is 2 / 12.
> On Xeon, it is 7 / 91.

pushf has to wait until all flag dependancies can be resolved. On the
P4 with >100 instructions in flight, that can take a long time. Popf
on the other hand has no dependancies on outstanding instructions as it
resets the machine state.

"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <>.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-05 04:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean