lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:09:42AM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Every processor I've ever measured it on, popf is slower. On P4, for
> example, pushf is 6 cycles, and popf is 54. On Opteron, it is 2 / 12.
> On Xeon, it is 7 / 91.

pushf has to wait until all flag dependancies can be resolved. On the
P4 with >100 instructions in flight, that can take a long time. Popf
on the other hand has no dependancies on outstanding instructions as it
resets the machine state.

-ben
--
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <dont@kvack.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-05 04:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans