[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] x86_64 UP needs smp_call_function_single
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 23:54 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> which is somewhat unpleasant. I added a WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()) to
> the
> out-of-line SMP version.

> btw, does anyone know why the SMP versions of this function use
> spin_lock_bh(&call_lock)?

that makes no sense (neither the get_cpu()/put_cpu() gymnastics) if this
is called with irqs disabled all the time.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-30 10:29    [W:0.050 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site