lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CPUFREQ-CPUHOTPLUG: Possible circular locking dependency

* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> So do we
> - Rethink the strategy of per-subsystem hotcpu-locks ?
>
> OR
>
> - Think of a way to straighten out the super-convoluted cpufreq code ?

i'm still wondering what the conceptual source of this fundamental
locking complexity in cpufreq (and hotplug) is - it is not intuitive to
me at all. Could you try to explain that?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-30 09:37    [W:0.074 / U:2.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site