Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:31:44 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: CPUFREQ-CPUHOTPLUG: Possible circular locking dependency |
| |
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> So do we > - Rethink the strategy of per-subsystem hotcpu-locks ? > > OR > > - Think of a way to straighten out the super-convoluted cpufreq code ?
i'm still wondering what the conceptual source of this fundamental locking complexity in cpufreq (and hotplug) is - it is not intuitive to me at all. Could you try to explain that?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |