lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] x86_64 UP needs smp_call_function_single
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:11:40 -0800
> Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:00:00 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 17:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> No, I think this patch is right - the declaration of the CONFIG_SMP
>>>> smp_call_function_single() is in linux/smp.h so the !CONFIG_SMP
>>>> declaration
>>>> or definition should be there too.
>>>>
>>>> It's still buggy though. It should disable local interrupts around
>>>> the
>>>> call to match the SMP version. I'll fix that separately.
>>> hm, didnt i send an updated patch for that already? See the patch below,
>>> from many days ago. I sent it after the tsc-sync-rewrite patch.
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> Has there been a patch for this one? (UP again, not SMP)
>>
>> drivers/input/ff-memless.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function 'local_bh_disable'
>> drivers/input/ff-memless.c:393: warning: implicit declaration of function 'local_bh_enable'
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ---
>> ~Randy
>> config: http://oss.oracle.com/~rdunlap/configs/config-input-up-header
>
> eww.. I guess linux/spinlock.h should really include linux/interrupt.h.
> But interrupt.h includes stuff like sched.h which will want spinlock.h.
>
> This, maybe?

Looks good. I had already tried (and failed) adding interrupt.h to spinlock.h --
what a mess.

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-30 23:33    [W:0.039 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site