[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] x86_64 UP needs smp_call_function_single
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:00:00 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 17:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > No, I think this patch is right - the declaration of the CONFIG_SMP
> > smp_call_function_single() is in linux/smp.h so the !CONFIG_SMP
> > declaration
> > or definition should be there too.
> >
> > It's still buggy though. It should disable local interrupts around
> > the
> > call to match the SMP version. I'll fix that separately.
> hm, didnt i send an updated patch for that already? See the patch below,
> from many days ago. I sent it after the tsc-sync-rewrite patch.

Hi Ingo,

Has there been a patch for this one? (UP again, not SMP)

drivers/input/ff-memless.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function 'local_bh_disable'
drivers/input/ff-memless.c:393: warning: implicit declaration of function 'local_bh_enable'

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-30 23:13    [W:0.059 / U:7.976 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site