[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> On Thursday 23 November 2006 05:39, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Dmitry Mishin (
>>> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Dmitry Mishin wrote:
>>>>>> This patch looks acceptable for us.
>>>>> good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
>>>>>> BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do
>>>>>> not see a reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work
>>>>>> and move existent patchset over his interface.
>>>>> yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's
>>>>> more in
>>>> Where is Andrey's patch?
>>> This thread -
>> Thanks, Dmitry. Now I do recall seeing that before.
>> That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with
>> the existing namespaces. For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for
>> refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your
>> own mechanism for unsharing.
>> It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever
>> practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to
>> fit onto Cedric's patch. Am I missing a complicating factor?
> No. I've already said, Cedric's patch is acceptable for us.

Do you mind if we port your patchset on top of this patch ? If you have
no time for that I can do it.

-- Daniel
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-29 19:01    [W:0.052 / U:4.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site