[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:23:39AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ( wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> >With provided patch it is possible to wakeup 'for-free' - just call
> >kevent_ctl(ready) with zero number of ready events, so thread will be
> >awakened if it was in poll(kevent_fd), kevent_wait() or
> >kevent_get_events().
> Yes, I realize that. But I wrote something else:
> >> Rather than mark an existing entry as ready, how about a call to
> >> inject a new ready event?
> >>
> >> This would be useful to implement functionality at userlevel and
> >> still use an event queue to announce the availability. Without this
> >> type of functionality we'd need to use indirect notification via
> >> signal or pipe or something like that.
> This is still something which is wanted.

Why do we want to inject _ready_ event, when it is possible to mark
event as ready and wakeup thread parked in syscall?

> --
> ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View,
> CA ❖

Evgeniy Polyakov
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-28 11:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site