lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2 -mm] fault-injection: safer defaults, trivial optimization, cleanup
From
Date
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:37 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

> We'd prefer one-patch-per-concept, please. This all sounds like about
> six patches.

Understood.

> We _could_ merge this patch as-is, but it means that when this stuff
> finally hits mainline it would go in as a nice sequence of logical patches,
> followed by a random thing which is splattered all over all the preceding
> patches.

Does this argue for a respin of the original patches, folding in
content from this one, rather than splitting it into an additional six to
be appended to the series?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-28 23:53    [W:0.065 / U:2.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site