Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:53:08 -0800 | From | "Mark Knecht" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt5 |
| |
On 11/28/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Ingo, > > I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your > > 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I > > am unable to build the realtime-lsm package against them so no reason > > to reboot. > > > > I know there were some comments awhile back about being required to > > switch to PAM. Has that occurred? > > > > If not then there is a regression issue for realtime-lsm. > > As Realtime LSM is an out of tree module and there's no stable kernel > module API it's impossible to prevent regressions. > > That being said, the realtime LSM patch is so simple that it should work > - how exactly does it fail? > > Lee
Hi Lee, The failure is a Gentoo sandbax failure. On the surface of it I didn't really think it was a kernel problem but I know you've pushed me to move to PAM telling me realtime-lsm wasn't going to work in the future. I really just wanted to know that PAM was now a requirement instead of only best practice.
Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |