lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:02:00PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >But in this case it will be impossible to have SIGEV_THREAD and
> >SIGEV_KEVENT
> >at the same time, it will be just the same as SIGEV_SIGNAL but with
> >different delivery mechanism. Is is what you expect for that?
>
> Yes, that's expected. The event if for the queue, not directed to a
> specific thread.
>
> If in future we want to think about preferably waking a specific thread
> we can then think about it. But I doubt that'll be beneficial. The
> thread specific part in the signal handling is only used to implement
> the SIGEV_THREAD notification.

Ok, so please review patch I sent, if it is ok from design point of
view, I will run some tests here.

> --
> ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View,
> CA ❖

--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-23 13:29    [W:0.231 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site