Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:23:36 +0300 | From | Evgeniy Polyakov <> | Subject | Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. |
| |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:02:00PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote: > Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > >But in this case it will be impossible to have SIGEV_THREAD and > >SIGEV_KEVENT > >at the same time, it will be just the same as SIGEV_SIGNAL but with > >different delivery mechanism. Is is what you expect for that? > > Yes, that's expected. The event if for the queue, not directed to a > specific thread. > > If in future we want to think about preferably waking a specific thread > we can then think about it. But I doubt that'll be beneficial. The > thread specific part in the signal handling is only used to implement > the SIGEV_THREAD notification.
Ok, so please review patch I sent, if it is ok from design point of view, I will run some tests here.
> -- > ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, > CA ❖
-- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |