Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:23:05 +0300 | From | Kirill Korotaev <> | Subject | Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework |
| |
>>>We will need this framework to move the network isolation code to the >>>ns_proxy/net_namespace structure. So if Cedric gives us a empty >>>framework it is fine, except if someone does not agree with it... >>> >>> -- Daniel. >> >>This patch looks acceptable for us. >>BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a >>reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent >>patchset over his interface. > > > If you are going to take that attitude. Where was this conversation? > > It appears several relevant people were not aware of this development > discussion. So when it comes up for general review you can expect your > approach as well as your code to be critiqued.
Eric,
Dim collected the requirements for all the network virtualization approaches: http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Network_virtualization This was discussed with Daniel and Herbert.
Dim and Daniel just wanted to prepare the patches for this. So I hope your critique will be constructive as they do a hard job :)
Thanks, Kirill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |