lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NTP time sync
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:36:33PM +0100, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>
>
> wrto the in-kernel NTP synchronization,
> as discussed before [1], my opinion
> is that it should be done in userland.
>
> Keeping it in kernel implies subtle code
> in each of the supported architectures.
>
> So, if the arch maintainers agree,
> I would suggest to schedule it for removal.
>
> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/28/358

Fine, provided there's also a shell tool that can enquire whether the
kernel is sync'd or not. (Currently the 11-minute update does not
occur when the kernel is desynced from a time source - the RTC itself
might be more accurate in this case.)

Throwing hwclock commands into crontab such that they do not take
note of the kernel's sync status is probably a very bad move in that
respect.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-22 20:55    [W:0.056 / U:3.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site