[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/11] Add __GFP_MOVABLE flag and update callers
    On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Mel Gorman wrote:

    > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    > > Are GFP_HIGHUSER allocations always movable? It would reduce the size of
    > > the patch if this would be added to GFP_HIGHUSER.
    > No, they aren't. Page tables allocated with HIGHPTE are currently not movable
    > for example. A number of drivers (infiniband for example) also use
    > __GFP_HIGHMEM that are not movable.

    HIGHPTE with __GFP_USER set? This is a page table page right?
    pte_alloc_one does currently not set GFP_USER:

    struct page *pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
    struct page *pte;

    pte =
    pte = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_ZERO, 0);
    return pte;

    How does infiniband insure that page migration does not move those pages?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-22 03:27    [W:0.019 / U:0.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site