Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:36:50 +0000 (GMT) | From | Hugh Dickins <> | Subject | Re: Re : vm: weird behaviour when munmapping |
| |
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Francis Moreau wrote: > On 11/18/06, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote: > > > > split_vma decides which address range will use the newly allocated > > vm_area_struct in such a way as to suit its own convenience, and > > again I don't agree. I would say that do_munmap() decides which > address range will use the new allocated vma object. split_vma() get > this information through its parameter named "new_below".
Yes, you're right.
Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |