[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] WorkStruct: Separate delayable and non-delayable events.
    David Howells wrote:
    > Separate delayable work items from non-delayable work items be splitting them
    > into a separate structure (dwork_struct), which incorporates a work_struct and
    > the timer_list removed from work_struct.
    > if (!delay)
    > - rc = queue_work(ata_wq, &ap->port_task);
    > + rc = queue_dwork(ata_wq, &ap->port_task);
    > else
    > rc = queue_delayed_work(ata_wq, &ap->port_task, delay);

    A consequent (if somewhat silly) name for queue_delayed_work would be
    queue_delayed_dwork, since it requires a struct dwork_struct.

    Are there many or frequent usages of "undelayed delayable work" like
    above, where runtime decides if a delay is necessary? If not,
    queue_dwork could be removed from the API and queue_(delayed_|d)work be
    called with delay=0.
    Stefan Richter
    -=====-=-==- =-== =-=--
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-20 16:37    [W:0.021 / U:0.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site