[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal

> > I found that sometimes processes disappear on some heavily used system
> > of mine without any logging. So I've written a patch against
> > which emits logging when a process emits a fatal signal.
> Why not to patch default signal handlers in glibc, to have not only
> stderr, but syslog, or /dev/kmsg copy of fatal messages?

Afaik when a proces gets shot because of a segfault, also the libraries
it used are shot so to say. iirc some of the more fatal signals are
handled directly by the kernel.

Folkert van Heusden

-- <- site where one can exchange PGP key signatures
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-18 03:05    [W:0.095 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site