[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe : vm: weird behaviour when munmapping
[me moving to Gmail 'cause yahoo sucks !]

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 14:12 +0000, moreau francis wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The new object is the one allocated using:
> new = kmem_cache_alloc(vm_area_cachep, SLAB_KERNEL);

Of course but at this point the choice of the new VMA is already made
by the caller. So in our case do_munmap() decided that B is the new
one as you said. But I still don't see why...

And as I said previously it will end up by calling consecutively:


> Please read Mel Gorman's book on memory management to gain a better
> understanding.

thanks for the link, but I don't expect to find out the answer to this
very specific question in it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-17 22:11    [W:0.068 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site