[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BUG: cpufreq notification broken
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > There is another issue with this SRCU change:
> >
> > The notification comes actually after the real change, which is bad. We
> > try to make the TSC usable by backing it with pm_timer accross such
> > states, but this behaviour breaks the safety code.
> I don't understand. Sending notifications is completely separate from
> setting up the notifier chain's head. The patch you mentioned didn't
> touch the code that sends the notifications.

Yeah, my bad. It just uses rcu based locking, but its still synchronous.

I have to dig deeper, why the change of the frequency happens _before_
the notifier arrives.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-16 22:37    [W:0.100 / U:1.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site