[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BUG: cpufreq notification broken
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 15:27 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Hmm, there are no static initializers for srcu and the only way to fix
> > this up is to move the arch calls to postcore_init.
> If you can find a way to invoke init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list
> earlier than core_initcall time, that would be okay. I did it this way
> because it was easiest, but earlier should be just as good.
> The only requirement is that alloc_percpu() has to be working, so that the
> SRCU per-cpu data values can be set up. I don't know how early in the
> boot process you can do per-cpu memory allocation.
> As an alternative approach, initialization of srcu_notifiers could be
> broken up into two pieces, one of which could be done statically. The
> part that has to be done dynamically (the SRCU initialization) wouldn't
> mess up the notifier chain. Provided the dynamic part is carried out
> while the system is still single-threaded, it would be safe.

There is another issue with this SRCU change:

The notification comes actually after the real change, which is bad. We
try to make the TSC usable by backing it with pm_timer accross such
states, but this behaviour breaks the safety code.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-16 22:09    [W:0.097 / U:7.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site