lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Boot failure with ext2 and initrds
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> The below might help.
>
> Indeed it does (with Martin's E2FSBLK warning fix),
> seems to be running well on all machines now.
>
> (Of course, my ext2_fsblk_t ext2_new_blocks() notion did not pan out,
> for same reason as the original: that ret_block was expected signed.)

Whilst I've got all the smart people looking at this ...

/*max window size: 1024(direct blocks) + 3([t,d]indirect blocks) */
#define EXT2_MAX_RESERVE_BLOCKS 1027

Is that wrong? If it's meaning one triple, one double, and one single
indirect block, surely it can span a boundary, so we need (potentially)
two of each?

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-14 22:23    [W:0.149 / U:1.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site