[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: touch_cache() only touches two thirds

    > The corrected code in <>
    > covers the full cache range. Granted that modern CPUs may be able to track
    > multiple simultaneous cache access streams: how many such streams are they
    > likely to be able to follow at once? It seems like going from 1 to 2 would
    > be a big win, 2 to 3 a small win, beyond that it wouldn't likely make much
    > incremental difference. So what do the actual implementations in the field
    > support?

    I remember reading at some point that a POWER4 could track at least 5+ parallel
    streams. I don't know how many K8 handles, but it is multiple too at least
    (forward and backwards)

    I don't have more data, but at least the newer Intel CPUs seem to be also
    very good at prefetching and when you look at a die photo the L/S unit
    in general is quite big. More than 6 streams handled is certainly a

    I guess it could be figured out with some clever benchmarking.
    > The code (original and corrected) uses 6 simultaneous streams.

    My gut feeling is that this is not enough.

    > I have a modified version that takes a `ways' parameter to use an arbitrary
    > number of streams. I'll post that onto

    Post it to the list please.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-11 01:27    [W:0.021 / U:14.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site