[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX_FD
Rusty Russell a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:09 -0800, wrote:
>> From: Andrew Morton <>
>> Apparently FUTEX_FD is unfixably racy and nothing uses it (or if it does, it
>> shouldn't).
>> Add a warning printk, give any remaining users six months to migrate off it.
> This makes sense. FUTEX_FD was for the NGPT project which did userspace
> threading, and hence couldn't block. It was always kind of a hack
> (although unfixably racy isn't quite right, it depends on usage).
> However, the existence of FUTEX_FD is what made Ingo complain that we
> couldn't simply pin the futex page in memory, because now a process
> could pin one page per fd. Removing it would seem to indicate that we
> can return to a much simpler scheme of (1) pinning a page when someone
> does futex_wait, and (2) simply comparing futexes by physical address.
> Now, I realize with some dismay that simplicity is no longer a futex
> feature, but it might be worth considering?

Hum... I am not sure playing MM games is good... really...

This discussion reminds me I posted a patch some time ago that got no comments
from the community.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-01 11:23    [W:0.035 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site