[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> ACK, of course, but I wonder if we can do something about these 1-line header
> files.
> Would it be reasonable to encourage developers to do something like
> #include <asm/foo.h>
> #else
> #include <asm-generic/foo.h>
> #endif
> to avoid these 1-line headers?

I actually think that _unconditional_ simple code is much nicer than
conditional one.

With the current setup, we have a number of one-line trivial headers
(which actually could be symlinks - the only downside of that is that
regular "patch" doesn't really know about them, even if git does, and can
handle them, including the "extended git patch" format). They are
unconditional, so following them never implies having to grep for
different architectures doing different things.

I personally absolutely detest the "ARCH_HAVE_FEATURE_FOO" kind of thing
that makes different architectures behave differently. I'd much rather
have a few small and simple files that all look the same and are totally
obvious, except for the odd architecture that actually caused the
arch-split in the first place.

(Also, if the files really _are_ entirely identical, at least it won't add
any overhead at all to git - they'll all use the same backing store)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.050 / U:6.380 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site